Risk Associations by the Cyst Characteristics and you may Bmi
† Without and with adjustment for BMI. Simple adjusted includes covariates for registry site (five sites), age at diagnosis (30–44, 45–49, 50–54, 55–59, 60–64, 65–69, 70–74, 75–79, ?80 years), year of diagnosis (1996–1998, 1999–2001, 2002–2003, 2004–2005), with and without BMI (18.5 – <25, 25 – <30, ?30kg/m 2 ).
‡ Fully adjusted model includes covariates for registry (five sites), age at diagnosis (30–44, 45–49, 50–54, 55–59, 60–64, 65–69, 70–74, 75–79, ?80 years), year of diagnosis (1996–1998, 1999–2001, 2002–2003, 2004–2005), BMI (18.5 – <25, 25 – <30, ?30kg/m 2 ), mode of detection (screen-detected, interval-detected, other screen, clinically detected, other), surgery/radiation (no breast surgery, breast conserving therapy without radiation, breast conserving therapy with radiation, other surgery), chemotherapy (yes/no), and annual median income (<$42 000, $42 000 – <$52 000, $52 000 – <$66 000, ?$66 000). Women with missing covariate information were excluded.
§ P worth away from Wald statistic to evaluate getting an overall impression away from categorical BI-RADS density. The mathematical screening had been one or two-sided.
Though BI-RADS thickness didn’t personalize likelihood of cancer of the breast dying in the relationship to most other pathological situations, females which have BI-RADS step 1 density had a tendency to have the highest chance, in almost any stratum
¶ AJCC stage is roofed just like the a good categorical covariate within the designs having the degrees joint, with and you may instead of phase IV.
Endurance model results for this new family ranging from mammographic occurrence and exposure out of breast cancer dying, overall and also by AJCC phase*
* AJCC = Western Combined Panel into Cancer tumors; BI-RADS = Nipple Imaging Revealing and Data System; Body mass index = body mass index; CI = trust period; Hour = chances ratio. N = 96 people omitted on the produce-specific designs.
† Without and with adjustment for BMI. Simple adjusted includes covariates for registry site (five sites), age at diagnosis (30–44, 45–49, 50–54, 55–59, 60–64, 65–69, 70–74, 75–79, ?80 years), year of diagnosis (1996–1998, 1999–2001, 2002–2003, 2004–2005), with and without BMI (18.5 – <25, 25 – <30, ?30kg/m 2 ).
‡ Fully adjusted model includes covariates for registry (five sites), age at diagnosis (30–44, 45–49, 50–54, 55–59, 60–64, 65–69, 70–74, 75–79, ?80 years), year of diagnosis (1996–1998, 1999–2001, 2002–2003, 2004–2005), BMI (18.5 – <25, 25 – <30, ?30kg/m 2 ), mode of detection (screen-detected, interval-detected, other screen, clinically detected, other), surgery/radiation (no breast surgery, breast conserving therapy without radiation, breast conserving therapy with radiation, other surgery), chemotherapy (yes/no), and annual median income (<$42 000, $42 000 – <$52 000, $52 000 – <$66 000, ?$66 000). Women with missing covariate information were excluded.
§ P well worth of Wald fact to evaluate having an overall impact out-of categorical BI-RADS occurrence. All the analytical assessment was indeed several-sided.
Whether or not BI-RADS density failed to personalize risk of cancer of the breast death in the link to almost every other pathological affairs, lady that have BI-RADS step 1 thickness tended to feel the higher chance, in every stratum
¶ AJCC phase is included because a good categorical covariate in the activities which have all amount mutual, that have and you may versus phase IV.
Certainly lady that have cancers with a minimum of 2.0cm, BI-RADS step 1 thickness was on the an increased risk of breast malignant tumors dying (Time = step 1.55, 95% CI = step one.14 to 2.09; P = .003 getting complete aftereffect of BI-RADS density; Table cuatro). Ladies who had one another BI-RADS 1 density and highest-stages cancers got a heightened chance of cancer of the breast dying (Hr = step one.45, 95% CI = 1.05 so you’re able to dos.02; P = .thirteen for total effectation of occurrence).
Success model results for the loved ones ranging from mammographic thickness and you may chance regarding cancer of the girlsdateforfree breast dying, stratified of the cyst functions, AJCC level I–IV combined*
* N = 96 women excluded from cause-specific models. Fully adjusted model includes covariates for AJCC stage (I, IIA, IIB, III, IV), registry (five sites), age at diagnosis (30–44, 45–49, 50–54, 55–59, 60–64, 65–69, 70–74, 75–79, ?80 years), year of diagnosis (1996–1998, 1999–2001, 2002–2003, 2004–2005), body mass index (18.5 – <25, 25 – <30, ?30kg/m 2 ), mode of detection (screen-detected, interval-detected, other screen, clinically detected, other), surgery/radiation (no breast surgery, breast conserving therapy without radiation, breast conserving therapy with radiation, other surgery), chemotherapy (yes/no), and annual median income (<$42 000, $42 000 – <$52 000, $52 000 – <$66 000, ?$66 000). Women with missing covariate information were excluded. AJCC = American Joint Committee on Cancer; BI-RADS = Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System; CI = confidence interval; ER = estrogen receptor; HR = hazard ratio; PR = progesterone receptor.